Wallet comparison with the ICLIP wallets
Small card wallets are now available from various providers. To highlight the differences, we compare our CANARD wallets with possible alternatives. Is the CANARD an alternative to the ICLIP wallets?
In the following section, we compare both manufacturers based on their features. For this comparison, we have chosen similar models.
![]()
Swipe right on small screen diagonals to display the entire table.
Manufacturer |
CANARD |
ICLIP |
|
|
|
|
Model |
Wallet LEATHER | AMBRA |
Wallet
|
Dimensions |
56 x 86 x 6-10 mm depending on the number of cards. |
65 x 88 x 16 mm |
Weight |
from 9g |
22g |
Number of cards |
2-10 cards | RFID protected with RFID Active Protection Card. |
12 cards | | RFID protected with RFID Active Protection Card. |
Banknotes |
Banknotes are folded twice. |
Banknotes are folded once and clipped into the wallet and folded neatly once more when closing the wallet. |
Coin compartment |
✔ Coin compartment available as an add-on. |
✖ |
Manufacturing |
Switzerland | Germany |
CONCLUSION
Both models are among the smallest wallets on the market, hardly larger than a credit card. The advantage of the feuil wallets is the variable overall thickness which can be influenced by the number of cards. Both feel comfortable in the hand due to their small size. Those who want to completely hide their banknotes are better served with the CANARD. Otherwise, both are practical small wallets.
CANARD and ICLIP value sustainability and production. That's why it is no coincidence that ICLIP manufactures its wallets in Germany.
Disclaimer: All rights to the information presented here as a comparison to the CANARD wallets belong to the ICLIP The Wallet brand. All information including images were taken directly from www.i-clip.com .


